pH of vaginal secretions in determining the type of vaginal microbiota and forecasting complicated gestation
Abstract
Feature 5 types of vaginal microbiota , based on the pH of the vaginal secretion of pregnant women ; infectious organism condition and status of gestation complications depending on pH. We prospectively examined 123 pregnant women in the I, II, III trimesters of pregnancy in order to clarify information content of the pH of the vaginal secretions to characterize vaginal biotope and its connection with the complications of gestation. Applied cytological standard microbiological techniques, real time PCR , the measurement of the pH of vaginal secretion test strips. Emphasis on the level of pH (< 4.0–> 5.5 ) 5 types of vaginal microbiota, shows the relationship of pH to a quantitative characteristic of the microflora, containing estradiol, gestation complications, inflammatory diseases of the somatic plan, the unstable relationship with the number of leukocytes in the smears. The authors recommend that the pH of the vaginal secretions to characterize vaginal biotope during pregnancy and gestation predict complications.
Downloads
References
Кира Е. Ф. Бактериальный вагиноз. – М.: МИА, 2012. – 471 с.
Липова Е. В., Болдырева М. Н., Трофимов Д. Ю. и др. Урогенитальные инфекции, обусловленные условно-патогенной биотой, у женщин репродуктивного возраста: Клинико-лабораторная диагностика. – М.: Медицина, 2009. – 44 с.
Нагорна В. Ф., Москаленко Т. Я., Гриценко А. А. Рівень рН –інтегральний показник стану здоров’я статевої системи жінки // Мед. аспекты здоровья семьи. – 2015. – Вип. 92, № 6. – C. 48–56.
Радзинский В. Е. Акушерская агрессия. – М.: Изд-во журнала Status praesens, 2011. – 688 с.
Шейка матки, влагалище, вульва. Физиология, патология, кольпоскопия, эстетическая коррекция / Под ред. С. И. Роговской, Е. В. Липовой. – М.: Изд-во журнала Status praesens, 2014. – 832 с.
Янковский Д. С., Широбоков В. П., Антипкин Ю. Г. и др. Микробиом и здоровье женщины (обзор литературы) // Репродуктивная эндокринология. – 2015. – Вип. 24, № 4. – С. 13–28.
Genazzani A. R., Prato B. Sophy project: evidences intimate hygiene // Giom. It. Ost. Gin. – 2005. – Vol. XXYII, N 7–8. – P. 278–279.
Guaschino S., Benvenuti C. SOPHY project:, an observational study of vaginal pH and lifestyle in women of different ages and in different physioopatological conditions // Minerva Ginecol. – 2008. – Vol. 60, N 2. – P. 105–114.
Prince A. L., Antony K. M., Chu D. M. et al. The microbiome parturition and timing of birth: more guestions, than answers // G. Reprod. Immunol. – 2014. – Vol. 35. – P. 104–105.
Ravel J., Gajer P., Abdo Z. et al. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive age women // G. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. – 2011. – Vol. 108 (Suppl. I). – P. 4680–4687.
Walter-Antonio M., Jeraldo P., Berg Miller M. E. et al. Pregnancy`s Stronghold on the Vaginal Microbiome // J. List, Plos One. – 2014. – Vol. 9, N 6. – P. 985–994.
Abstract views: 82 PDF Downloads: 69
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN 
ISSN 
